Home Original › Forums › General Discussion › receiver unconscious of psychic affect/communication – names/studies?
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 27, 2023 at 6:35 pm #100000689
BDBParticipantHello,
I’m starting to research this particular phenomena/affect and am not sure what it’s called, if it has a name.
It’s where someone is unconsciously affected by a psychic affect and thinks, believes, behaves in line with that communication/affect — without being aware the thinking/belief/behaviour originated psychically from someone else.
There’s telepathy but that’s usually conscious communication on/by both parties. If the receiver doesn’t receive/get the message consciously then it’s thought to have not worked or happened. What I’m talking about, it may be that the sender is unconscious or conscious of the interaction/affect, but the receiver is typically not consciously aware so the affect/communication — it goes in under their radar as it were. Then bubbles up as it were, maybe much time later or maybe in the moment, affecting their thoughts/beliefs/behaviour without them knowing they’ve been influenced or are being influenced in such a way. (I happen to know from experience this is an actual phenomena.)
PK/psychokinesis also seems slightly relevant as something’s affected, someone’s unconscious (then that in turn has an affect on someone’s conscious). But that doesn’t seem completely right either.
Physical locality seems to help. Direct line of sight from sender to receiver can increase the affect further but isn’t absolutely necessary.
Osmosis, contagion are a couple of descriptive words which seem relevant to what I’m getting at.
Once I have some names/labels I’ll be able to find studies/experiments etc. hopefully. Any names and/or study/exeriment/paper pointers would be great. Thanks in advance.
January 22, 2024 at 9:51 pm #100000700
Annalisa VentolaKeymasterHi BDB. The closest thing I can think of relating to this is Rex Stanford’s PMIR model. There’s more about it at the Psi Encyclopedia: https://psi-encyclopedia.spr.ac.uk/articles/rex-g-stanford#Psi-mediated_Instrumental_Research
March 11, 2026 at 8:21 pm #100001481
DMJessupParticipantThere is the empath connection, and herd poisoning, and distant intent. Dr. Stephen Porges calls it neuroception. Some people think it is a guardian angel, and it can just be another extension of telepathy.
I can think of one perfect example. I’m not a paranoid or fearful person, and one day I was suddenly very paranoid and I was peeking from behind curtains, thinking my own intuition was trying to tell me that I was in danger. After there was no danger, I meditated on it, and my niece appeared in my mind’s eye. I popped back out of meditation and texted her “Wassup?” and she responded that she was hiding behind the Disney display at the mall where she works because there was an active shooter. Relative, active emotional connection, family, etc.
I believe that there are a lot of our daily moods, emotions, and thoughts that are likely not our own. The energetic clarity of what is happening is often missing and people don’t know how to separate what is self, and what is not.Glad to supply my form of meditation if it interests you. Hypnagogic meditation, or awareness in the fulcrum.
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.